|
|
The Year In Review For Annuities
|
Alabama,
Arizona,
Connecticut, DC, Florida,
Illinois, New Jersey,
New Mexico, New York,
South Carolina,
Tennessee, Wisconsin
|
Legislation and regulation in 2007 brought some
interesting changes for the annuity industry. Most notably are the
attempts and lack of successes at passing the Interstate Insurance Product
Regulation Compact. In 2007, a single state, Tennessee, passed legislation
joining the Compact, bringing the total to 30 states now participating in
the Compact. Seven additional
states (Alabama, Arizona, Connecticut, Florida, Missouri, New Mexico,
South Carolina) let proposed legislation die in session. Some states
appear reluctant to join the Compact and fearful that their ability to
have local oversight of insurance issues will be compromised. Four states
(Illinois, New Jersey, New York, Wisconsin) and the District of Columbia,
still have proposed legislation pending.
The Interstate Insurance Product Regulation Commission
intends to streamline and speed up the process of product approval and
speed to market. The Commission has made significant advances toward this
goal and approved its first insurance product in July 2007.
|
|
California,
Illinois,
Indiana, Iowa,
Maryland, Montana,
South Carolina,
Texas
|
Suitability and unfair
trade practice issues were also significant topics of discussion during
the 2007 legislative session. The states of California, Hawaii, Illinois,
Indiana, Iowa, Maryland, Montana, South Carolina, and Texas all initiated
changes in these areas although not all proposals passed. The basis for
most of the proposed legislation concerning suitability was the NAIC model
act, which focused on categories to be considered in determining
suitability and record retention requirements placed upon carriers and
agents alike. Some legislatures and agencies chose to expand already
existing laws and regulations concerning suitability of annuity
transactions to all annuity transactions despite the person’s age.
|
|
Iowa
|
In 2007 Iowa joined steps taken by California in 2005,
and lead the industry in requiring index annuity training. Unlike
California, the Iowa requirement extends to index life insurance as well
as index annuities. Included in the Unfair Trade Practices regulations,
the new requirements set forth a specific training for producers and
places an onus on carriers to make certain producers have completed the
training prior to soliciting such products in the state.
In addition to information on determining client
suitability, the 4 hour course must cover the types of annuities, annuity
contract provisions and riders, specific index strategies, the advantages
and disadvantages of annuitization, account
value enhancements, policy owner considerations for consumers over age 65,
and distinguishing characteristics of index life products. Unlike
California, however, the Iowa requirement is a one time requirement, which
may give California a leg up in keeping its agents up-to-date on new
developments in the area of index annuities.
|
|
New
York
Rhode Island
|
New York and Rhode Island addressed specific issues not
part of other state’s legislative sessions. New York attempted to
increase the levels of debtor exemptions in order to put New York
residents on the same footing as residents of other states. The New York
Senate attempted make the atmosphere in New York slightly friendlier to
index annuities by proposing amendments to its non-forfeiture laws
although limiting surrender periods and withdrawal charges.
Rhode Island dealt with unsuitable annuity product
sales to seniors who take advantage of reverse mortgages. The last action
on that bill was a referral to the Senate Corporation committee.
|
What lies ahead for legislative proposals in the 2008
legislative sessions?
· Look
for a few more states to join the Interstate Insurance Product Regulation
Compact.
· Enhancement
in suitability and replacement regulations.
· Watch
as California again attempts to introduce suitability language for annuity
sales.
· It is also likely that additional training requirements
for index products will be adopted by states and further restrictions on
designations used in conjunction with insurance and annuity sales.
|
Past Topics
Annuities - How
Much Is Too Much?
Insurance Compact Commission Holds Inaugural Meeting
Insurance Regulatory History
|